UPDIG Photographers Guidelines | version 4.0 |
UPDIG Home | Guidelines Menu | Table of Contents | Previous: Color Spaces | Resolution | Next: File Formats |
Besides color profile issues, perhaps the biggest stumbling block to quality reproduction is inappropriate file resolution. Some digital cameras produce a native file that is marked as x inches high by y inches wide — at 72 ppi (pixels per inch). This sometimes results in printers receiving files of the correct height and width but insufficient resolution. This mistake is so common printers recite a mantra that all files need to be 300 ppi when the image is sized to the final height and width to be printed. As a generalization, this is not bad. However, if you have good communication with a knowledgeable printer, you can use the more sophisticated standard of setting the file's resolution (expressed in pixels per inch) to 1.3 to 2.0 times the halftone-screen ruling (expressed in lines per inch) for the job. Files of lower-than-optimum resolution will not deliver as much image detail and crispness as the output device can reproduce. Excessively high resolution, on the other hand, is wasteful of computer resources; the surplus data can only be discarded, yet the file will take longer to transmit, more memory to process and more disk space to store. The resolution of digital images intended for computer displays is usually described by absolute pixel dimensions: width and height in pixels. For printing, width and height are often stated in inches, requiring a third value: of pixels per inch. (Outside the U.S., dimensions are stated in centimeters or millimeters, and resolutions expressed in pixels per centimeter [ppc] or per millimeter [ppm].) Beware: It's easy to confuse ppi with dpi (dots per inch), which refers to the resolution of a printing device, or with lpi (lines per inch), which describes a halftone grid or screen used for printing images on a press. rules of thumb
digital capture quality parameters: sensor size and file dimensions Sensor size and file dimensions offer only a rough guide to final printed quality. You can enlarge or reduce digital image files by interpolation in imaging software, which adds or removes pixels. RIP software and hardware can also interpolate during printing. Properly handled, interpolation can increase digital image files in size by as much as 400 percent. However, success depends on the qualities of the original file and the final output required. Note that increasing resolution through interpolation cannot add detail to a file. It may, however, prevent obvious pixilation, offering a smoother look.
Stock-image distributors, magazine publishers or others requesting files may specify a certain minimum size for camera sensors used to generate image files. However, pixel quality trumps pixel numbers, so that a high-quality 6-MP sensor will often be sufficient for 95 percent of intended uses, while pictures from a 10-MP sensor in a point-and-shoot camera may not look good beyond 8x10 inches at 300 ppi, especially if used at an ISO exposure setting above 200. Although many publishers have standardized on 300 ppi for 150-line screens, the actual requirement is 1.3 to 2.0 times the line-screen resolution, so as a practical matter, smaller files can successfully work for a given final size. |
UPDIG Home | Guidelines Menu | Table of Contents | Previous: Color Spaces | Resolution | Next: File Formats |