UPDIG Photographers Guidelines | version 4.0 |
UPDIG Home | Guidelines Menu | Table of Contents | Previous: Resolution | File Formats | Next: Naming Files |
File formats vary widely. They include "lossless" compression types, such as LZW-compressed GIF and TIFF, PSD and most raw file formats, and uncompressed types, such as standard TIFFs. Some formats, such as JPEG2000 and HD Photo (JPEG XR), offer both lossy and lossless compressions. Although lossy compression at high compression rates can create visible artifacts, many call lower compression rates "visually lossless." For the web, use JPEG. For printing, uncompressed TIFF is often preferred, although high-quality JPEGs are usually visually indistinguishable from TIFFs, and some prefer them due to file delivery and/or storage considerations. Between capture and final output is an important intermediate step: the RGB master file. RGB master files are Photoshop (.PSD) or TIFF files, optimized in a large-gamut color space, such as Adobe RGB or ProPhoto RGB, at either the digital camera's native file size or interpolated to a larger size (consistent with any possible future use) by a raw-file-conversion program. (We should mention there are some caveats to consider when choosing an extra-wide gamut space such as ProPhoto RGB instead of Adobe RGB. While the larger gamut does imply a wider range of image data preserved "down the line," it also implies bigger image transformations, possibly with bigger shifts in the color of the image, when it is converted to a narrow-gamut color space such as CMYK. In addition, an extra-wide color space necessitates the use of 16-bit image editing to avoid problems such as posterization or banding.) Leave RGB master files unsharpened or sharpen only on a removable layer, since resizing for future uses is likely. Archive master files along with the raw files for a project. raw file formats Although you should capture images at the highest quality your workflow requires, the best quality clearly comes from capturing in a raw file format. The advantages of raw file formats include:
While UPDIG advocates capturing raw format images whenever your workflow supports it, there are several potentially negative issues with raw file formats as opposed to capturing JPEGs or TIFFs. Most serious is the issue of proprietary, undocumented raw file formats becoming obsolete, unsupported, and eventually, inaccessible. (Luminous Landscape offers good analysis of this problem.) In addition, there are workflow problems associated with raw file formats. Proprietary raw files must be converted to another format or paired to sidecar files, before metadata can be safely added. If the raw files are converted to a standard format, such as TIFF or JPEG, they lose their ability to be non-destructively edited. If they are paired to sidecar files, they are harder to manage. And no cataloging software can read any color adjustment information contained in the sidecar files. Even proof-printing raw files, so your client can see your intended interpretation of the file, usually requires a batch conversion to another file format. There are several interesting possibilities for solving this problem:
|
UPDIG Home | Guidelines Menu | Table of Contents | Previous: Resolution | File Formats | Next: Naming Files |